
15
U.S.C. 12-27
15 U.S.C. §16 (Tunney
Act): Judgments
(a) Prima facie
evidence; collateral estoppel. A final judgment or decree heretofore or
hereafter rendered in any civil or criminal proceeding brought by or on
behalf of the United States under the antitrust laws to the effect that
a defendant has violated said laws shall be prima facie evidence
against such defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other
party against such defendant under said laws as to all matters
respecting which said judgment or decree would be an estoppel as
between the parties thereto: Provided, That this section shall not
apply to consent judgments or decrees entered before any testimony has
been taken. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to
impose any limitation on the application of collateral estoppel, except
that, in any action or proceeding brought under the antitrust laws,
collateral estoppel effect shall not be given to any finding made by
the Federal Trade Commission under the antitrust laws or under section
45 of this title which could give rise to a claim for relief under the
antitrust laws.
(b) Consent judgments
and competitive impact statements; publication in Federal Register;
availability of copies to the public. Any proposal for a consent judgment
submitted by the United States for entry in any civil proceeding
brought by or on behalf of the United States under the antitrust laws
shall be filed with the district court before which such proceeding is
pending and published by the United States in the Federal Register at
least 60 days prior to the effective date of such judgment. Any written
comments relating to such proposal and any responses by the United
States thereto, shall also be filed with such district court and
published by the United States in the Federal Register within such
sixty-day period. Copies of such proposal and any other materials and
documents which the United States considered determinative in
formulating such proposal, shall also be made available to the public
at the district court and in such other districts as the court may
subsequently direct. Simultaneously with the filing of such proposal,
unless otherwise instructed by the court, the United States shall file
with the district court, publish in the Federal Register, and
thereafter furnish to any person upon request, a competitive impact
statement which shall recite—the nature and purpose of the
proceeding; a description of the practices or events giving rise to the
alleged violation of the antitrust laws;
an explanation of the
proposal for a consent judgment, including an explanation of any
unusual circumstances giving rise to such proposal or any provision
contained therein, relief to be obtained thereby, and the anticipated
effects on competition of such relief;
the remedies available
to potential private plaintiffs damaged by the alleged violation in the
event that such proposal for the consent judgment is entered in such
proceeding;
a description of the
procedures available for modification of such proposal; and
a description and
evaluation of alternatives to such proposal actually considered by the
United States.
(c) Publication of
summaries in newspapers. The United States shall also cause to be
published, commencing at least 60 days prior to the effective date of
the judgment described in subsection (b) of this section, for 7 days
over a period of 2 weeks in newspapers of general circulation of the
district in which the case has been filed, in the District of Columbia,
and in such other districts as the court may direct—a summary of the
terms of the proposal for the consent judgment, a summary of the
competitive impact statement filed under subsection (b) of this
section,
and a list of the
materials and documents under subsection (b) of this section which the
United States shall make available for purposes of meaningful public
comment, and the place where such materials and documents are available
for public inspection.
(d) Consideration of
public comments by Attorney General and publication of response. During
the 60-day period as specified in subsection (b) of this section, and
such additional time as the United States may request and the court may
grant, the United States shall receive and consider any written
comments relating to the proposal for the consent judgment submitted
under subsection (b) of this section. The Attorney General or his
designee shall establish procedures to carry out the provisions of this
subsection, but such 60-day time period shall not be shortened except
by order of the district court upon a showing that (1) extraordinary
circumstances require such shortening and (2) such shortening is not
adverse to the public interest. At the close of the period during which
such comments may be received, the United States shall file with the
district court and cause to be published in the Federal Register a
response to such comments.
(e) Public interest
determination. Before entering any consent judgment proposed by the
United States under this section, the court shall determine that the
entry of such judgment is in the public interest. For the purpose of
such determination, the court may consider—the competitive impact of
such judgment, including termination of alleged violations, provisions
for enforcement and modification, duration or relief sought,
anticipated effects of alternative remedies actually considered, and
any other considerations bearing upon the adequacy of such judgment;
the
impact of entry of such judgment upon the public generally and
individuals alleging specific injury from the violations set forth in
the complaint including consideration of the public benefit, if any, to
be derived from a determination of the issues at trial.
(f) Procedure for
public interest determination. In making its determination under
subsection (e) of this section, the court may—take testimony of
Government officials or experts or such other expert witnesses, upon
motion of any party or participant or upon its own motion, as the court
may deem appropriate; appoint a special master and such outside
consultants or expert witnesses as the court may deem appropriate; and
request and obtain the views, evaluations, or advice of any individual,
group or agency of government with respect to any aspects of the
proposed judgment or the effect of such judgment, in such manner as the
court deems appropriate;
authorize full or
limited participation in proceedings before the court by interested
persons or agencies, including appearance amicus curiae, intervention
as a party pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
examination of witnesses or documentary materials, or participation in
any other manner and extent which serves the public interest as the
court may deem appropriate;
review any comments
including any objections filed with the United States under subsection
(d) of this section concerning the proposed judgment and the responses
of the United States to such comments and objections; and
take such other action
in the public interest as the court may deem appropriate.
(g) Filing of written
or oral communications with the district court. Not later than 10 days
following the date of the filing of any proposal for a consent judgment
under subsection (b) of this section, each defendant shall file with
the district court a description of any and all written or oral
communications by or on behalf of such defendant, including any and all
written or oral communications on behalf of such defendant, or other
person, with any officer or employee of the United States concerning or
relevant to such proposal, except that any such communications made by
counsel of record alone with the Attorney General or the employees of
the Department of Justice alone shall be excluded from the requirements
of this subsection. Prior to the entry of any consent judgment pursuant
to the antitrust laws, each defendant shall certify to the district
court that the requirements of this subsection have been complied with
and that such filing is a true and complete description of such
communications known to the defendant or which the defendant reasonably
should have known.
(h) Inadmissibility as
evidence of proceedings before the district court and the competitive
impact statement. Proceedings before the district court under subsections
(e) and (f) of this section, and the competitive impact statement filed
under subsection (b) of this section, shall not be admissible against
any defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other party
against such defendant under the antitrust laws or by the United States
under section 15a of this title nor constitute a basis for the
introduction of the consent judgment as prima facie evidence against
such defendant in any such action or proceeding.
(i) Suspension of
limitations. Whenever any civil or criminal proceeding is instituted by
the United States to prevent, restrain, or punish violations of any of
the antitrust laws, but not including an action under section 15a of
this title, the running of the statute of limitations in respect of
every private or State right of action arising under said laws and
based in whole or in part on any matter complained of in said
proceeding shall be suspended during the pendency thereof and for one
year thereafter: Provided, however, That whenever the running of the
statute of limitations in respect of a cause of action arising under
section 15 or 15c of this title is suspended hereunder, any action to
enforce such cause of action shall be forever barred unless commenced
either within the period of suspension or within four years after the
cause of action accrued.
Click
here to view the full "raw"/non-hyperlinked text of 15 U.S.C.
§§1-27, complete with legislative history, amendment, and
cross-reference information.